Your letters: May 28, 2021

Drug courts work

May is National Drug Court Month. The drug court is technically a criminal court, but it works differently. In a traditional criminal court, an accused is found guilty or not guilty. The drug court is not that. The drug court focuses on sobriety, not guilt or innocence. The purpose of drug court is to treat drug addiction – to help addicts quit. When the drug court works, the results are life changing.

Our criminal courts have a host of well-documented faults, such as implicit bias, mass incarceration, and excessive reliance on plea bargaining. Drug courts, on the other hand, are replete with stories of people who have come back from the abyss of drug addiction to lead productive lives.

Substance use disorder is a disease. Unlike other illnesses, people with SUD frequently engage in behaviors that result in incarceration. The courts have understood that it is illogical to stop our path to recovery and that the revolving door of drug use, arrest, incarceration, release and reuse has served us badly. The drug court model calls for defendants with SUD to be placed in treatment and not in prison.

When an accused completes drug court, criminal charges are dismissed and a judicial graduation ceremony takes place. I am a public defender who manages the treatment courts. I have attended several of these graduation ceremonies over the years. The testimonies of family members of drug court graduates still move me to tears. We hear legions of stories of loved ones who were lost to drugs and who are now whole; lives saved; and a keen awareness of future crimes that will not be committed.

Along with the drug court, there is a community of supportive treatment providers. There are dedicated court treatment teams to help addicts stay sober. This month, as we honor our Treatment Courts, we reiterate our decision to invest in sobriety and recovery, in people, not in prisons.

Mark Shoup, Apple Valley

Explanation needed

Here is a headline from the PA that appeared in the Daily Press on Sunday, May 16: “Cash boon helps Newsom shake up recall election. In it, journalist Michael R. Blood writes: “… the state budget was endowed with a surplus of $ 76 billion and $ 27 billion in federal pandemic aid.” .

Now, here’s a headline from the Los Angeles Times that appeared in the Daily Press on Tuesday, May 25: “Repairs Still Lagging Despite Rising Gasoline Taxes.” The caption read: “California Officials Now Lament Insufficient Funding.”

Something is wrong here. Looking for an explanation.

CA Meschter, Victorville

The party line

“Let’s be honest with the American people – this was not an insurgency, and we can’t call it that and be honest. If you didn’t know the TV footage was a January 6 video, you would actually think it was a normal sightseeing visit. -Representative. Andrew Clyde, R-GA

“My constituents demand answers, but the truth is censored and withheld. As a result, the DOJ harasses peaceful patriots across the country. »-Representative. Paul Gosar, R-AZ

“I don’t know who polled that they were Trump supporters.” -Representative. Ralph Norman, R-SC

“Many Democrats have put forward a story that has been circulating since January 6 that has never been corrected, for example, the story that President Trump rioted on January 6.” -Representative. Jody Rice, R-GA

“Can we move forward without President Trump? The answer is no. I’ve always loved Liz Cheney, but she decided the Republican Party couldn’t grow up with President Trump. I have determined that we cannot grow up without him. Senator Lyndsey Graham, R-SC

“The Party told you to dismiss the evidence with your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. —George Orwell, “1984”

James Simon, Apple Valley

Two Excedrin for gun control advocacy

Since McDonald v. Chicago in 2010, the United States Supreme Court waived any further gun control appeals from states whose lawyers had continued to denigrate the waters and challenge the Second Amendment as they were safe in their jurisdictions.

California’s Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals had long been filled with liberal judges. In other words, until the Obama administration fails to reappoint the outgoing judges. The Trump administration has literally tamed the “Ninth Liberal” with ten Tory nominations in 2020. Tories now covet more than a third of the center-right seats in the court – once the most anti-gun appeals court in country fire.

After languishing in the lower federal courts, there is a plethora of pending firearms appeals for the new Ninth, either out of justification or by sending them to the Supreme Court for further hearings for the pro lobby. -fire arms.

Over time, some of those constitutional revisionists who have caught our attention have become the veneer that impinges on the Second and Fourth Amendments, giving legitimacy to our participation in the democratic process – tested by this ever more ingenious document which we call our Constitution. . Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that California Senator Dianne Feinstein’s Red Flag Act (as it applied to House Bill HR 5717) was unconstitutional.

At the heart of the Fourth Amendment guarantee is a person’s right to be safe in their home and not to be subjected to unreasonable government intrusion. While there are many on the left who do not support the Second Amendment, supporters of police reform should welcome Monday’s decision as consolation. The High Court restricted the power of law enforcement over the right of American citizens to protect themselves.

Bryan A. Cook, Phelan

Want to join the conversation? Send your submissions of 300 words or less to [email protected] Include your address and phone number for residency verification (these will not be published). Put “Letter to the Editor” with a suggested title in the subject field. All letters are subject to change and rejection

Source link

About Eric Harris

Eric Harris

Check Also

Voting reform could kill the Labor Party

Many progressives are certain that the only hope of ending the Conservative regime is to …